Skip to main content

Table 3 Demographic and clinical characteristics

From: Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam-Ketamine or Midazolam-Propofol Combinations on Hemodynamic Stability, Patient Comfort, and Post-anesthesia Recovery in Children Undergoing Sedation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Procedures

 

Midazolam-Ketamine

Midazolam-Propofol

p

Sex

Male (n)

10 (50%)

13 (65%)

0.337

Female (n)

10 (50%)

7 (35%)

Age (mean ± SD) (years)

3.1 ± 1.68

4.75 ± 3.55

0.068

MR procedure time (mean ± SD) (min)

17.5 ± 11.41

13.75 ± 2.75

0.161

Total procedure time (mean ± SD) (min)

22.15 ± 11.66

19.5 ± 3.59

0.338

Weight (mean ± SD) (kg)

13.8 ± 4.13

17.9 ± 8.38

0.057

ASA (n)

I:13

I:14

0.25

II:7

II:6

MRI scanning quality (n)

1:14 (70%)

1: 9 (45%)

0.114

2: 6 (30%)

2:11 (55%)

3:0

3:0

Family Satisfaction (n)

1:14 (70%)

1:9 (45%)

0.114

2:6 (30%)

2:11 (55%)

3: 0

3:0

RSS (min-max)

1-5

2-4

0.826

  1. ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, RSS Ramsay Sedation Score, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, n Number of patients