Skip to main content

Table 2 Study characteristics

From: Anesthesia for cesarean delivery: general or regional anesthesia—a systematic review

Author/year

Title

Method

No. of participants

Location

Abdallah/2014 (Abdallah et al. 2014)

A comparative study of GA versus combined spinal-epidural anesthesia on the fetus in cesarean section

Cross-sectional observational prospective study

60 consecutive pregnant women at term

Kasr Al-Aini Obstetric Hospital, Egypt

Jain/2013 (Jain et al. 2013)

A randomized comparison of the effects of low-dose spinal or GA on umbilical cord blood gases during cesarean delivery of growth-restricted fetuses with impaired Doppler flow

Prospective, randomized clinical trial

40 pregnant women

Tertiary care hospital, India

Arslantas/2019 (Arslantas and Umuroglu 2019)

Comparing the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on the postoperative pain intensity in patients undergoing emergent or elective cesarean section

Prospective, observational study

212 parturient women

Istanbul, Turkey

Chen/2019 (Chen et al. 2019)

Comparison of effects of GA and combined spinal/epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery on umbilical cord blood gas values: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study

A double-blind, randomized, controlled study

112 parturient women

The First People’s Hospital of Jingzhou, China

Saygi/2015 (Saygi et al. 2015)

Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial

Randomized clinical trial

100 patients who underwent elective cesarean section

Tertiary-level public hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Solangi/2012 (Solangi et al. 2012)

Comparison of the effects of general versus spinal anesthesia on neonatal outcome

Randomized control trial

160 patients

Peoples Medical College Hospital, Nawabshah, Pakistan

Açıkel/2017 (Açıkel et al. 2017)

Comparison of patient satisfaction between general and spinal anesthesia in emergency cesarean deliveries

Prospective, single-blind, cross-sectional clinical study

100 patients

Turkey

Edipoglu/2018 (Edipoglu et al. 2018)

Effect of anesthetic technique on neonatal morbidity in emergency cesarean section for fetal distress

Prospective observational study

61 patients

Tertiary Education and Research Hospital, Turkey

Mancuso/2010 (Mancuso et al. 2010)

General versus spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean sections: effects on neonatal short-term outcome. A prospective randomized study

A prospective randomized study

234 pregnant women

Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical Sciences and Reproductive Medicine in Messina University Hospital, Italy

Madkour/2019 (Madkour et al. 2019)

General versus spinal anesthesia during elective cesarean section in term low-risk pregnancy as regards maternal and neonatal outcomes: a prospective, controlled clinical trial

Prospective, controlled clinical trial

64 low-risk pregnant women

Zagazig University Hospital, Egypt

Staikou/2013 (Staikou et al. 2013)

Maternal and umbilical cord oxygen content and acid-base balance in relation to general, epidural or subarachnoid anesthesia for term elective cesarean section

Randomized study

380 parturient women

Athens, Greece

Saracoglu/2012 (Saracoglu et al. 2012)

Neuraxial block versus GA for cesarean section: post-operative pain scores and analgesic requirements

Prospective, double-blinded study

60 patients undergoing elective cesarean surgery

Central Education and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey

Havas/2013 (Havas et al. 2013)

Spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section is associated with shorter hospital stay compared to GA

Prospective study

188 term parturient women

Istanbul, Turkey

Kessous/2012 (Kessous et al. 2012)

Spinal versus GA in cesarean sections: the effects on postoperative pain perception

Prospective, observational study

153 women were enrolled

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Soroka University Medical Centre in Be’er Sheva, Israel