- Case report
- Open Access
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane catheter for postoperative continuous analgesia in a patient undergoing pericardial window opening surgery for pericardial tamponade: a case report
Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology volume 12, Article number: 9 (2020)
Anesthetic management of pericardial tamponade is requiring full use of abilities for anesthesiologists because of associated cardiovascular problems inherent to this condition, with its associated comorbidities.
A 55-year-old man diagnosed with severe mitral insufficiency, asthma, diabetes, and pleural effusion in the lungs and pericardial effusion was scheduled for pericardial window opening surgery.
Due to compromised lung functions and asthma of the patient led to an anesthetic plan of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane catheter placement for long-term continuous analgesia.
Anesthetic management of pericardial tamponade is requiring full use of abilities for anesthesiologists because of associated cardiovascular problems inherent to this condition, with its associated comorbidities. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is recently described by Forero et al (Forero et al. 2016). Since then, this technique has been used in a wide variety of indications including postoperative analgesia, surgical anesthesia, and management of chronic pain (Altinpulluk et al. 2018).
Surgical drainage can be achieved by the creation of a subxiphoid pericardial window, or a small anterior thoracotomy using either an open or thoracoscopic approach or by the creation of a pericardial-peritoneal window (Grocott et al. 2011; O’Connor and Tuman 2010).
The ESP block is safe and simple to apply, compared with paravertebral blocks or thoracic epidural. ESP block prevents both visceral and somatic pain in several case reports and studies in breast surgery (Bonvicini et al. 2017; Selvi and Tulgar 2019).
Here, we report a successful ESP block and catheter for postoperative analgesia in a patient who underwent pericardial window opening surgery.
A written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
A 55-year-old man (72 kg, 175 cm) was diagnosed with pericardial tamponade while being monitored in coronary intensive care unit (CCU) due to heart failure. In his medical history, he had asthma, type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism, and coronary artery disease. The patient’s American Society of Anesthesiologists Score was III. The patient was scheduled for pericardial window opening surgery (lateral thoracotomy approach) by our Department of Cardiovascular Surgery.
Unilateral ESP block and inserting of a catheter was planned for postoperative analgesia. Induction of anesthesia was performed using propofol 2 mg kg− 1, fentanyl 100 μg, and rocuronium 0.5 mg kg− 1. Anesthesia was maintained with 2% sevoflurane mixed with 50% oxygen and air following a successful intubation. ESP block and insertion of the catheter was performed in the prone position at T5 vertebral level using 8-MHz linear ultrasound probe (Esaote Mylab Six Ultrasound System Genoa, Italy) in sterile conditions. Firstly, the probe was located 3 cm lateral to the T1 spinous process and scanned through the T5 vertebra and trapezius, rhomboideus major, and erector spinae muscles were displayed superficial to the transverse process. An 18-gauge Tuohy needle (Braun Perifix, Germany) was inserted using in-plane technique at the level of T5 transverse process. When the tip of the needle reached and touched the T5 transverse process, 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine was administered after confirming the correct location by hydrodissection anterior to erector spinae muscle with 1–2 mL saline solution (Fig. 1). Then, the multi-orifice catheter was advanced through the Tuohy needle into the hydro-dissected area within the plane (Fig. 2). The tip of the catheter was left between T5 and T4 vertebra transverse processes with 3 cm part in the soft tissue. The catheter was secured using the instant skin adherence apparatus (Fig. 3). No complications occurred during and after the block procedure. A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device fastened to the catheter tip and adjusted for pacing 5 mL h− 1 0.25% bupivacaine.
During surgery, which included a semi-oblique incision in the fourth intercostal region, no complications such as severe hypotension or arrhythmia occurred. After 45 min of surgery, the patient was transferred to the postanesthesia care unit for close postoperative follow-up. The pain was measured using numeric rating scale (NRS) (“0” representing “no pain,” “10” representing “worst pain imaginable”), and it was < 2 in PACU. The patient’s modified Aldrete’s score was 10, and he was transferred to the general ward. He did not need any rescue analgesic postoperatively, and the catheter was withdrawn due to infection related concerns after 24 h.
In this case, a local anesthetic injection was applied unilaterally via a PCA device which includes 120 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine in total (5 mL per hour for 24 h). Although there is still not enough clear data over local analgesic dose in ESP block, De Cassai suggested 3.6 mL of local anesthetic for each targeted dermatome, and he proposed the application of high volume and low concentration formula for plane blocks (De Cassai and Tonetti 2018). Therefore, in this case, local anesthetics were diluted and used in a greater volume to reach the adequate spread of sensorial block. We did not observe any signs of neurotoxicity or cardiotoxicity in our patient during the treatment period.
Successful ESP blocks have been used in major abdominal surgery and breast implant surgeries (Bonvicini et al. 2017; Restrepo-Garces et al. 2017). Although the mechanism of analgesic efficacy of ESP block remains unclear, previous cadaver models have demonstrated that deposition of local anesthetic deep (anterior) to the erector spinae muscle reaches the paravertebral space through connective tissues and ligaments (Chin et al. 2017). Radiological imaging of a cadaver model has shown that ESP leads to widespread sensory block between C7 and T8 when it is applied at the level of T5. This area was our target field for pericardial window opening surgery (lateral thoracotomy approach). We propose that ESP block may be an alternative and useful choice for postoperative analgesia in pericardial window opening surgery (lateral thoracotomy approach). Since ESP has an effect on the dorsal, ventral, and communicant ramus of spinal nerve roots, it is similar to paravertebral block or thoracic epidural block, without the complications attributed to these two major methods (Grocott et al. 2011). In addition, it is easy to perform in intubated patients with fewer complications because the needle insertion point is at a distant location to important anatomical structures especially to pleura.
Dyspnea is the most common presenting finding with cardiac tamponade (Gandhi et al. 2008). Medications trigger a minority of asthma attacks, but reactions can be serious. Postoperative pain can also trigger asthma attacks; therefore, impaired pulmonary functions after surgery may be worsened by postoperative pain, while effective analgesia can prevent respiratory complications (Xue et al. 1999). In another case report, Scimia et al. performed an ultrasound-guided ESP block in a patient undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in which they placed a catheter for a continuous ESP block (Scimia et al. 2017). They removed the catheter on the third postoperative day and reported a sensory block at the T2 to T10 dermatomes which supplied good quality of analgesia. Wilson et al. performed a single-shot ESP block in a patient compromised respiratory function and reported that single-shot ESP block not only provided successful analgesia but it also improved the arterial blood gas and chest radiographs of the patient (Wilson et al. 2018).
In conclusion, a preemptive ESP block with continuous analgesia in a patient undergoing pericardial window opening surgery for pericardial tamponade may provide effective analgesia as a part of multimodal analgesia treatment for compromised lung functions.
Availability of data and materials
The data was extracted from the medical records file of the patient and the materials are being used which were available in our set up with valid reasons.
Erector spinae plane
Intensive care unit
Numeric rating scale
Altinpulluk EY, Simón DG, Fajardo-Pérez M (2018) Erector spinae plane block for analgesia after lower segment caesarean section: case report. Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition) 65:284 6%@ 2341–1929
Bonvicini D, Giacomazzi A, Pizzirani E (2017) Use of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in breast surgery. Minerva Anestesiologica 83:1111 2%@ 0375–9393
Chin KJ, Malhas L, Perlas A (2017) The erector spinae plane block provides visceral abdominal analgesia in bariatric surgery: a report of 3 cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med 42:372–376 %@ 1098–7339
De Cassai A, Tonetti T (2018) Local anesthetic spread during erector spinae plane block. J Clin Anesth 48:60 %@ 1873–4529
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ (2016) The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 41:621–627
Gandhi S, Schneider A, Mohiuddin S et al (2008) Has the clinical presentation and clinician’s index of suspicion of cardiac tamponade changed over the past decade? Echocardiography 25:237–241 %@ 0742–2822
Grocott HP, Gulati H, Srinathan S, Mackensen GB (2011) Anesthesia and the patient with pericardial disease. Can J Anaesth 58:952 %@ 0832-610X
O’Connor CJ, Tuman KJ (2010) The intraoperative management of patients with pericardial tamponade. Anesthesiol Clin 28:87–96
Restrepo-Garces CE, Chin KJ, Suarez P, Diaz A (2017) Bilateral continuous erector spinae plane block contributes to effective postoperative analgesia after major open abdominal surgery: a case report. A & A Case Rep 9:319–321 %@ 2325–7237
Scimia P, Ricci EB, Droghetti A, Fusco P (2017) The ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 42:537 %@ 1098–7339
Selvi O, Tulgar S (2019) Use of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in segmental mastectomy. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 47:158–160
Wilson JMB, Lohser J, Klaibert B (2018) Erector spinae plane block for postoperative rescue analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery. J Cardiothorac Casc Anesth 32:e5–e7 %@ 1053–0770
Xue FS, Li BW, Zhang GS et al (1999) The influence of surgical sites on early postoperative hypoxemia in adults undergoing elective surgery. Anesthe Analg 88:213–219 %@ 0003–2999
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval is not required for publication of isolated case reports.
Consent for publication
Written permission/consent for reproduction of images of the patient for the purpose of publication in an educational medical journal was obtained from the patient.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Şahin, A., Gültekin, A., Gürkan, S. et al. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane catheter for postoperative continuous analgesia in a patient undergoing pericardial window opening surgery for pericardial tamponade: a case report. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol 12, 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-020-00058-x
- Pericardial tamponade
- Erector spinae plane block