Skip to main content

Could early infusion of fish-oil-based lipid emulsion affect the need for intensive care in moderately diseased COVID-19 patients? A randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Background

Sixty moderate diseased COVID-19 patients were divided into two equal groups and were enrolled in a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Group C was delivered standard enteral nutrition plus 100 ml/day of 0.9% normal saline. Group L was delivered fish-oil-based lipid emulsion (FOBLE) supplementation to standard enteral nutrition at a dose of 100 ml/day. Both groups infused at a rate of 12.5 ml/h over 8 h for 5 days. We aimed to compare the effect of FOBLE versus placebo in COVID-19 disease to clarify the impact on the number of patients shifted to the ICU, oxygenation, inflammatory markers, and short-term outcomes (7 days).

Results

The failed conventional care and shift to ICU was significantly lower in group L in comparison to group C (six patients (20.0%) versus 14 patients (46.7%) shifted to ICU, P-value = 0.028). The inflammatory markers were determined and evaluated. Throughout the trial, there were no significant changes with the exception of the 7th day neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), when the ratio was lower in group L than in group C (6.10 (3.90–7.20) versus 9.65 (8.30–10.90), respectively, P-value 0.001).

Conclusions

In moderate diseased COVID-19 patients, early administration of parenteral FOBLE as an adjuvant to enteral feeding reduces shifts and so minimizes the burden on the ICU.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (NCT04957940). Registered on 5 July 2021.

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus discovered in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 (Gorbalenya et al. 2020). COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020 (WHO 2020).

Antiviral medications like lopinavir, ritonavir, and remdesivir; antibacterial treatments like macrolides; and antimalarial drugs like hydroxychloroquine are used to treat COVID-19. The major approach is to optimize respiratory functions, especially in those with lower respiratory tract involvement. Supportive therapy appears to be the most successful treatment method during the course of the disease. The condition has a greater morbidity and mortality rate, particularly in elderly patients with weakened immune systems, those with dietary deficits, and those with chronic illnesses (Hu et al. 2017; Mehta, 2020).

A fish-oil-based lipid emulsion (FOBLE) is a product that is high in omega-3 fatty acids, such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), which are long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Heller et al. (2006) have shown that supplementation with FOBLE or Ꞷ-3 fatty acids improves outcomes in various patient subgroups.

We believe that administering FOBLE early in the moderate cases of COVID-19 alters the inflammatory response and decreases the number of patients shifted to the ICU.

Methods

This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial, approved by the University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB17300631 on July 2021). The methodology of this study followed the Declaration of Helsinki (revised DOH 2013). Written informed consent was taken from the patients or their 1st-degree relatives. The trial was registered before patient enrollment in the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04957940) in July 2021.

Patients who were ≥ 18 years with the diagnosis of moderate cases of COVID-19 and a person who had a lower respiratory illness, such as pneumonia, were enrolled. However, their oxygen saturation levels remained ≥ 94% (National Institute of Health 2021) requiring only conventional therapy (supplemental oxygen in the form of a simple nasal cannula or venturi mask oxygen, anti-viral, antipyretic medications) with good enteral nutrition. Diagnosis of the cases was confirmed using RT-PCR for detection of the viral RNA by TaqMan™ 2019-nCoV Control Kit v1 (Cat. No. A47532) supplied by QIAGEN, Germany on the Applied Biosystem 7500 Fast RT PCR System, USA. Patients were excluded with severe criteria of COVID-19 before the five doses of SMOF lipid 20% were completed, hypersensitivity, uncontrolled hyperlipidemia, severe primary blood coagulation diseases, acute pancreatitis, acute thromboembolic diseases, severe liver failure, RIFLE stage III and IV renal failure, pregnancy or lactation, and severe neutropenia (< 500 cells/mm3).

Patients who met the enrollment requirements were assigned an ascending serial number in the sequence in which they were enrolled. The patients were assigned to one of the trial groups based on this number. The patient’s prescription included a patient number, which was utilized to prepare the all-in-one bag for the patient. The clinical pharmacist assisted in the creation of the double-blind solutions (by covering the solution bottle and connecting lines by the opaque shield). Study masking: outcome assessors and patients were unaware of the randomization until all subjects’ 7-day (within the study period) follow-ups were completed.

At the time of admission, patients had a peripheral venous line placed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard enteral nutrition plus 100 ml/day of 0.9% normal saline at a rate of 12.5 ml/h over 8 h for 5 days as the control group (Group C) or intravenous fish-oil-based lipid (SMOF lipid 20%) emulsion supplementation to standard enteral nutrition (group L) in a dose of 100 ml/day at a rate of 12.5 ml/h over 8 h for 5 days. To flush the system, 20 mL of 0.9% normal saline was injected into the burette. When each infusion was finished, the entire equipment was discarded. For each infusion, the entire procedure was repeated.

The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, lactate, D-dimer, serum ferritin (recorded at 0, 2, 5, and 7 days), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels (recorded at 0 and day 7) were measured. Sodium, potassium, chloride, AST, ALT, total triglycerides, random blood sugar (RBS), urea, creatinine, albumin, and total bilirubin were all measured (recorded at 0 and day 7). Partial arterial oxygen tension/ fraction of inspired oxygen PaO2/ FiO2 (P/F) ratio and respiratory rate (RR) were assessed and recorded at 0, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days.

Comorbidities, e.g., DM, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea, were recorded and patients continued with their regular treatment. Failed conventional care treatment, converted patients to severe cases, and shift to the ICU for more advanced treatment (more oxygenation and/or ventilation) were recorded. Severe illness was defined for individuals who had SpO2 < 94% on room air at sea level, a ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) < 300, respiratory frequency > 30 breaths per minute, or lung infiltrates > 50% (National Institute of Health 2021), taking consideration that P/F ratio for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is < 100.

The primary outcome was the number of patients shifted to the ICU for upgrading oxygenation and/or ventilation. Secondary outcomes were short-term outcome (7 days), P/F ratio, RR, NLR, serum CRP, lactate, D-dimer, ferritin, and interleukin-6 levels. Adverse events or complications related to SMOF lipid 20% were treated and recorded.

Sample size

This study was a randomized trial to evaluate the impact of FOBLE on the number of patients shifted to the ICU for upgrading oxygenation and/or ventilation. Sample size calculation was carried out using G*Power 3 software. A calculated minimum sample of 52 participants was needed to be divided into two equal groups in order to detect an effect size of 0.8 with an error probability of 0.05 and 80% power on a two-tailed test. We added 15% to the calculated sample to compensate for dropouts.

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 22.0 was used for data management and data analysis. Numbers with percentages described qualitative data. The chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used for comparing independent categorical variables. Statistical analysis of the data was conducted for baseline results. We presented descriptive statistics (e.g., mean and standard deviation for normally distributed variables, or median and interquartile range for skewed variables). Differences between groups were analyzed using the Student t-test or Mann–Whitney test for normally distributed or skewed variables respectively. ROC curve analysis of 7th day P/F and NLR was used in predicting failed conventional care and shift to ICU (Fig. 1). The P-value was two-tailed and considered significant at 0.05 levels.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The 7th-day P/F & NLR ROC curves and their correlation in predicting failed conventional care and shift to ICU between the studied groups

Results

Among the 74 patients who were screened for eligibility, 14 patients were excluded (9 did not meet inclusion criteria, 5 patients did not sign for consent). Sixty patients were finally analyzed between the two study groups, as shown in the flow chart of the studied groups (Fig. 2). The demographic data of the enrolled patients (age, gender, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and the clinical data (smoking, and co-existing diseases) showed no significant differences between the two study groups (Table 1). Also, there were no significant differences between both groups regarding laboratory data (HB, WBCs, platelets, random blood sugar, total triglycerides) as in Supplementary table 1 and (Na, K, Cl, AST, ALT, albumin, total proteins, urea, creatinine) as shown in Supplementary table 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

CONSORT Flow Chart between the study group

Table 1 Demographic and clinical data in the two study groups

Regarding the failed conventional care and shift to ICU, it was significantly lower in group L in comparison to group C (six patients (20.0%) versus 14 patients (46.7%) shifted to ICU, P-value = 0.028) as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Failed conventional care and shift to ICU between the two groups

The inflammatory markers were measured and assessed. There were no significant differences between the studied groups for serum ferritin, D-dimer, serum lactate, CRP, IL-6 levels, and NLR throughout the study time, except for the 7th day NLR, where the ratio was decreased in group L than in group C (6.10 (3.90–7.20) versus 9.65 (8.30–10.90) respectively, P-value < 0.001) as shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Inflammatory markers in the two study groups

Regarding RR, there was less increase in group L in comparison to group C on the 5th and 7th day (5th day RR of 15.00 versus 18.00 respectively, P-value = 0.005, 7th day RR of 18.00 versus 20.00 respectively, P-value = 0.017). For P/F ratio, there was less decrease in group L than in group C (5th day P/F ratio 198.50 (188.00–216.00) versus 182.50 (123.00–215.00) respectively, P-value = 0.044, 7th day P/F ratio 197.50 (178.00–215.00) versus 169.50 (100.00–203.00) respectively, P-value = 0.019) as shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Oxygenation and ventilation variables, respiratory rate (RR), and outcome in the two study groups

The ROC curves for the 7th day P/F and NLR and their correlation in predicting failed conventional care and shift to ICU between the studied groups showed good to excellent diagnostic tests. ROC curves for 7th day P/F showed a higher area under the ROC curve in group C in correlation to group L (1 versus 0.896). The optimal cut-off points were 152.50 in group C at sensitivity (SE) = 100% and specificity (SP) = 100% versus 160.50 in group L at SE = 83.3% and SP = 100%. ROC curves for 7th day NLR showed a higher area under the ROC curve in group L than in group C (0.983 versus 0.933). The optimal cut-off points were 7.05 in group L at SE = 100% and SP = 87.5% versus 10.30 in group C at SE = 71.4% and SP = 100% as shown in Fig. 1.

The outcome was compared between both groups; home discharge (eight patients in group L versus three in group C), ICU shift (six patients in group L versus 14 in group C), and continued conventional treatment after the study time frame (16 patients in group L versus 13 in group C), and no patients died throughout the study time (7 days), P-value = 0.055 as shown in Table 3.

Discussion

Modulating the inflammatory response in SARS-CoV-2 is one of the target therapies. This study investigated the early effect of intravenous FOLE in moderate diseased COVID-19 patients to reduce the burden of inflammatory mediators and reduce the need for ICU. All COVID-19 patients were treated according to management protocol for COVID-19 patients Ministry of Health (Masoud et al. 2020).

In our trial, we found that the number of patients shifted to ICU was lower in the group that received FOBLE in comparison to the group that received standard enteral nutrition. Also, by the 5th and 7th days, the inflammatory response was reduced, and oxygenation was less affected in patients who received FOBLE supplemented enteral nutrition.

When SARS-CoV-2 infects the upper and lower respiratory tracts, it appears to activate a cascade of inflammation in the lower respiratory tract, resulting in ARDS (Rabi et al 2020). COVID-19 severity is linked to a cytokine profile comparable to secondary hemophagocytic lympho-histiocytosis, as well as high levels of ferritin and IL-6, both of which are considered mortality predictors (Mehta et al. 2020). This could be a sign of viremia-induced hyperinflammation.

ω-3 oral, enteral, or parenteral administration of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) is possible. When administered intravenously (1–3 days), they are absorbed into plasma phospholipids and blood cells faster than when given orally or enterally (4–7 days) (van der Meij et al. 2011). PUFAs help membrane phospholipids maintain their structural integrity and fluidity. Furthermore, PUFAs impact gene expression and serve as a source of lipid mediators such as eicosanoids (Calder and Grimble 2002). The omega-6 fatty acid arachidonic acid (ARA), as well as the omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), influences inflammatory and immunological responses. Eicosanoids generated from EPA and DHA are often less inflammatory than ARA-derived eicosanoids. EPA-derived mediators, for example, have a lower affinity for eicosanoid receptors than ARA-derived mediators (Calder and Yaqoob 2012).

The anti-inflammatory impact of EPA and DHA has been linked to a decrease in ARA in membrane phospholipids, which results in less inflammatory ARA-derived lipid mediators being produced and more inflammatory EPA-derived lipid mediators being produced (Calder 2020). Supplementing with EPA and DHA can boost the proportion of both fatty acids in blood lipids, blood cells, and a variety of organ compartments. EPA and DHA are incorporated into phospholipids in a dose and time-dependent manner, with EPA being incorporated faster than DHA (Calder 2012).

SMOF lipid is a mix of coconut oil, soybean oil, olive oil, and fish oil. Fish oil is high in bioactive ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (EPA and DHA), which suppress the synthesis of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids and cytokines while promoting the creation of anti-inflammatory cytokines and inflammation-resolving lipid mediators (Calder 2009).

In line with our study, Weill et al. (2020) examined the features of ω-3 PUFAs, which include interference with viral entry and replication as well as inflammatory inhibition, resulting in improved outcomes in critically sick patients with ARDS. When bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was added to A549 cells, it was discovered that increasing the ratio of ω-3:ω-6 PUFAs resulted in lower levels of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), as well as higher levels of IL-10 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR) (Cotogni et al. 2015).

Inflammatory mediators are reduced in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome after administration of ω-3 fatty acids, according to Pacht et al. (2003). In a dose-dependent way, Heller et al. (2006) found that parenteral fish oil emulsion boosted survival while decreasing infection rates, antimicrobial needs, and duration of hospital stay.

Several experimental results have been made public. Hecker et al. (2014) looked at how three parenteral lipid emulsions affected morphology, leukocyte infiltration, protein leakage, and cytokine production in a mouse model of ARDS. Fish oil was found to have anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving effects on lung injury when compared to long-chain triglycerides (LCT) or medium-chain triglycerides (MCT)/LCT emulsions, indicating that partial replacement of n-6 fatty acids with marine n-3 fatty acids during ARDS may be beneficial. In a rat model of acute lung injury, Kohama et al. (2014) found that, when compared to soybean oil, parenteral nutrition supplemented with fish oil improved gas exchange and inhibited both neutrophil recruitment and upregulation of inflammatory mediator mRNAs, as well as increased anti-inflammatory eicosanoid 4-series leukotrienes (LTB5) production.

In addition, Hosny et al. (2013) studied the efficacy and safety of high-dose EPA and DHA supplementation (9 g/d with 1 g/day ascorbic acid + 400UI/12 h alpha-tocopherol and 100 g/day selenium) in patients with early-stage sepsis for 7 days. CRP, IL-6, and procalcitonin levels were found to be lower in the supplemented group than in the control group. In addition to these findings, the supplemented group had a lower requirement for mechanical breathing, a shorter period of mechanical ventilation, and a lower risk of developing severe sepsis, according to the authors.

In contrast, a randomized multicenter prospective study in patients with acute lung injury comparing intermittent enteral fish oil (EPA and DHA) to a normal saline bolus over 14 days found no benefit in inflammatory biomarkers in bronchoalveolar lavage and plasma, nor improvement in organ failure score, ventilator-free days, intensive care unit-free days, or 60-day mortalities (Stapleton et al. 2011).

In a prospective cross-over investigation of 19 patients with early ARDS (3 ± 2 days after onset of ARDS, after at least 12 h of stability of PaO2/FiO2 without any change in ventilator settings), mixed emulsions including MCTs and LCTs were found to have no effect on gas exchange (Smyrniotis et al. 2001).

Points of strengths

The study’s strengths were the fact that the two groups were assigned at random and that nearly all of the patients in both groups had co-existing illnesses. We could also add SMOF lipid 20% as a supplement because we provided FOBLE early after admission and our trial comprised of patients who had good enteral nutrition.

Limitations

Our findings cannot be generalized to all COVID-19 patients, particularly those who are severely ill. The study was limited in that it only looked at moderate cases of COVID-19 patients, with severe cases being eliminated. Second, we did not follow up with patients after the study ended, thus we were unable to determine their final outcomes. Finally, large size multicenter studies are required to reach this conclusion.

Recommendations

Our findings suggest that early use of a fish-oil-based lipid emulsion could minimize the inflammatory response and enhance the outcome in moderate cases of COVID-19. To better understand the impact of this promising diet, we urge that researchers do trials on varied concentrations and timings of FOBLE in different stages of COVID-19.

Conclusions

This trial shows that early administration of parenteral FOBLE (SMOF lipid 20%) as an adjuvant treatment to enteral nutrition reduces transfers to the ICU by lowering inflammation, preventing oxygenation deterioration, and improving prognosis in COVID-19 patients with moderate disease.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease of 2019

FOBLE:

Fish-oil-based lipid emulsion

SARS-COV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

SE:

Sensitivity

SP:

Specificity

EPA:

Eicosapentaenoic acid

DHA:

Docosahexaenoic acid

NLR:

Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio

CRP:

C-reactive protein

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

RBS:

Random blood sugar

P/F:

PaO2/ FiO2 ratio

RR:

Respiratory rate

ARDS:

Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

BMI:

Body mass index

PUFAs:

Polyunsaturated fatty acids

ARA:

Acid arachidonic acid

NF-kB:

Nuclear factor kappa B

COX-2:

Cyclooxygenase-2

PGE2:

Prostaglandin E2

PPAR:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma

LCT:

Long-chain triglycerides

MCT:

Medium-chain triglycerides

References

  • Calder PC (2009) Rationale for using new lipid emulsions in parenteral nutrition and a review of the trials performed in adults. Proc Nutr Soc 68:252–260

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder PC (2012) Mechanisms of action of (n-3) fatty acids. J Nutr 142:592S-599S

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder PC (2020) Nutrition, immunity, and COVID-19. BMJ Nutr Prev Health 3:74–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder PC, Grimble RF (2002) Polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and immunity. Eur J Clin Nutr 56:S14–S19

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder PC, Yaqoob P (2012) Marine omega-3 fatty acids and coronary heart disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 27:412–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotogni P, Trombetta A, Muzio G, Maggiora M, Canuto RA (2015) The omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid modulates inflammatory mediator release in human alveolar cells exposed to bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of ARDS patients. Biomed Res Int 2015:642520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, Groot RJ, Drosten C, Gulyaeva AA, Haagmans BL, Lauber C, Leontovich AM, Neuman BW, Penzar D, Perlman S, Poon LLM, Samborskiy D, Sidorov IA, Sola I, Ziebuhr J (2020) Severe aAcute Rrespiratory Ssyndrome Rrelated Ccoronavirus: the species and its viruses - a statement of the Coronavirus Study Group. BioRxiv 2020:937862

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker M, Ott J, Sondermann C, Schaefer M, Obert M, Hecker A, Morty RE, Vadasz I, Herold S, Rosengarten B, Witzenrath M, Seeger W, Mayer K (2014) Immunomodulation by fish-oil containing lipid emulsions in murine acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 18:R85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller AR, Rossler S, Litz RJ, Stehr SN, Heller SC, Koch R, Koch T (2006) Omega-3 fatty acids improve the diagnosis-related clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 34:972–979

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosny M, Nahas R, Ali S, Elshafei SA, Khaled H (2013) Impact of oral omega-3 fatty acids supplementation in early sepsis on clinical outcome and immunomodulation. J Crit Care Med 1:119–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu B, Zeng LP, Yang XL, Ge XY, Zhang W, Li B, Xie JZ, Shen XR, Zhang YZ, Wang N, Luo DS, Zheng XS, Wang MN, Daszak P, Wang LF, Cui J, Shi ZL. Discovery of a rich gene pool of bat SARS-related coronaviruses provides new insights into the origin of SARS coronavirus. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(11):e1006698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006698.

  • Kohama K, Nakao A, Terashima M, Aoyama-Ishikawa M, Shimizu T, Harada D, Nakayama M, Yamashita H, Fujiwara M, Kotani J (2014) Supplementation of parenteral nutrition with fish oil attenuates acute lung injury in a rat model. J Clin Biochem Nutr 54:116–121

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masoud H, Elassal G, Hassany M, Shawky A, Hakim M, Zaky S, Baki A, Abdelbary A, Ehab K, Amin W, Attia E, Ibrahem H, Eid A (2020) Management Pprotocol for COVID-19 Ppatients MoHP Pprotocol for COVID19 November 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta S (2020) Nutritional status and COVID-19: an opportunity for lasting change? Clin Med (lond) 20:270–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ, HLH across specialty collaboration, UK (2020) COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 395:1033–1034

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Health (2021) Overview/clinical-spectrum/. Clin. Spectr. SARS-CoV-2 Infect. (Accessed January 15th, 2021).

  • Pacht ER, DeMichele SJ, Nelson JL, Hart J, Wennberg AK, Gadek JE (2003) Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic acid, and antioxidants reduces alveolar inflammatory mediators and protein influx in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 31:491–500

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabi FA, Al Zoubi MS, Kasasbeh GA, Salameh DM, Al-Nasser AD (2020) SARS-CoV-2 and Coronavirus Disease 2019: what we know so far. Pathogens 9:E231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyrniotis VE, Kostopanagiotou GG, Arkadopoulos NF, Theodoraki KA, Kotsis TE, Lambrou AT, Vassiliou JG (2001) Long-chain versus medium-chain lipids in acute pancreatitis complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome: effects on pulmonary hemodynamics and gas exchange. Clin Nutr 20:139

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton RD, Martin TR, Weiss NS, Crowley JJ, Gundel SJ, Nathens AB, Akhtar SR, Ruzinski JT, Caldwell E, Curtis JR, Heyland DK, Watkins TR, Parsons PE, Martin JM, Wurfel MM, Hallstrand TS, Sims KA, Neff MJ (2011) A phase II randomized placebo-controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 39:1655–1662

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meij BS, van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, Langius JA, Brouwer IA, van Leeuwen PA (2011) n-3 PUFAs in cancer, surgery, and critical care: a systematic review on clinical effects, incorporation, and washout of oral or enteral compared with parenteral supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr 94:1248–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill P, Plissonneau C, Legrand P, Rioux V, Thibault R (2020) May omega-3 fatty acid dietary supplementation help reduce severe complications in Covid-19 patients? Biochimie 179:275–280

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2020) Director-General’s remarks at the media briefing on 2019-nCoV on 11 February 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the help from our great nurses in collecting data.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OM participated in the design and conduct of the study, data analysis and writing, and revision of the manuscript. YH participated in the design of the study, data analysis, and writing and revision of the manuscript. AM participated in the design of the study, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. EA participated in the design and conduct of the study, data analysis, writing, and revision of the manuscript. All authors were involved in the drafting of the work, approved the final manuscript, and stated that the manuscript represents honest work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar M. Soliman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Assiut University's Institutional Review Board (IRB17300631 on July 2021). The methodology of this study followed the Declaration of Helsinki (revised DOH 2013). The trial was registered before patient enrollment in The Clinical Trials.gov (NCT04957940) on July 2021. Written informed consent was taken from the patients or their first degree relatives.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplemental Table 1. First laboratory markers in the two study groups.

Additional file 2:

Supplemental Table 2. Second laboratory markers in the two study groups.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soliman, O.M., Abbas, Y.H., Aboelhassan, A.M.A. et al. Could early infusion of fish-oil-based lipid emulsion affect the need for intensive care in moderately diseased COVID-19 patients? A randomized clinical trial. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol 14, 54 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-022-00251-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-022-00251-0

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Enteral nutrition
  • Fish-oil-based lipid emulsion
  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2)
  • Shift to ICU
  • SMOF lipid 20%