Skip to main content

Effect of cannula size on pain on propofol injection in children receiving general anesthesia—an observational study

Sir,

Pain on injection of Propofol during general anesthesia has not been studied in children. After approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee and obtaining consent, a total of 120 children of age group 7 to 15 years posted for surgery under general anesthesia were included. Children with egg allergy, hemodynamically unstable patients, and local bruising or skin redness were excluded. Patients were allocated into 2 groups: Group 1–22 gauge (G) cannula and Group 2–24 G cannula. Intravenous (IV) canulation was done in the preoperative area. The site and size of the cannula were decided upon the availability of the vein by the anesthesia team. Children were shifted in OT, and standard monitoring was done. Then, preservative-free Inj. Lidocaine (0.5 mg/kg) was given IV and manual occlusion was done for 60 s. Then, induction of anesthesia was started with 1% Propofol (2–3 mg/kg) administered IV over a period of 20 s. Pain perception by the patients on propofol induction was scored with 4 point verbal scoring system (Ohnhaus et al. 1975): (1) no pain, no reaction to the injection; (2) slight pain (minor verbal or facial response); (3) moderate pain (clear verbal or facial response); and (4) severe pain (patient complains of pain and withdraws the arm). The primary outcome was the effect of cannula size on the intensity of pain caused by propofol injection. The secondary outcomes were to observe change in heart rate and blood pressure.

There were 87 males and 33 females. Group 1 (22 G cannula) and Group 2 (24G cannula) had 55 and 65 patients, respectively. Thirty-six (30%) patients underwent cannulation of a large vein in forearm while eighty-four (70%) were cannulated at a small vein at the dorsum of the hand. In this study, 73.3% (88/120) patients felt pain during propofol injection and 26.7% (32/120) felt no pain.

Of the 88 patients with pain, 49 (55.7%) had mild pain, 28 (31.8%) had moderate pain, and 11 (12.5%) had severe pain. In these patients, 16% were cannulated in a forearm vein and 84% in a dorsal hand vein (p < 0.05), like (McCulloch et al. 1985). In these patients, 38.6% patients size 22 G cannulae were used and in 61.4% 24G cannulae were used (p < 0.05).

Patients who felt no pain, 31.3% of patients received propofol through a cannula inserted in the dorsum of the hand, while 68.7% received the drug through a cannula inserted in the forearm; p value (0.007). In this group, 65.6% 22G cannula and 34.4% 24G cannula were used; p value < 0.001.

There is a significant increase in heart rate (p < 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (p = 0.003) post-intervention in 24 G cannula group as compared to 22 G cannula group as in (Dewhirst et al. 2013) and (Imanaka et al. 2009).

In our study, propofol injection pain was 62.8% in patients with larger cannula and 83.1% in those with smaller cannula. A bigger cannula reduced discomfort, supporting results of Bachmann et al. 2003

We found that children had less pain when propofol was injected into a larger forearm vein than a smaller dorsal hand vein and when a larger gauze cannula was utilized.

Availability of data and materials

Available on request.

Abbreviations

G:

Gauge

IV:

Intravenous

OT:

Operation theater

References

  • Bachmann-Mennenga B, Ohlmer A, Heesen, (2003) Incidence of pain after intravenous. Injection of a medium-/long-chain triglyceride emulsion of propofol. an observational study in 1375 patients. Arzneimittelforschung 53:621–626

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dewhirst E, Lancaster C, Tobias JD (2013) Hemodynamic changes following the administration of propofol to facilitate endotracheal intubation during sevoflurane anesthesia. Int J Clin Exp Med 6:26–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imanaka N, Nakasuji M, Nomura M, Higuchi M, Nakamura M, Tanaka M, Kawashima H (2009) Hypertension with tachycardia caused by propofol during induction of general anesthesia. Masui 58:652–654

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch MJ, Lees NW (1985) Assessment and modification of pain on induction with propofol (Diprivan). Anaesthesia 40:1117–1120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohnhaus EE, Adler R (1975) Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1:379–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PY contributed to the study conception, design, data acquisition, and drafting the article. SG and AS contributed to the data acquisition and drafting the article. NK contributed to the interpretation of the data and revising the article. PB contributed to revising the article. The authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shilpa Goyal or Ankur Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethics approval was taken from Institution Ethical Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur - AIIMS/IEC/2019-20/835 dated 15.06.2019.). Consent to participate was taken from the parents of children. Clinical Trial Registry of India- Ref no. CTRI/2019/09/021404.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, P., Goyal, S., Sharma, A. et al. Effect of cannula size on pain on propofol injection in children receiving general anesthesia—an observational study. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol 15, 47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-023-00337-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-023-00337-3