- Open Access
Hypertonic saline in ICU setting: what is its position? A systematic review and empirical analysis
Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology volume 14, Article number: 55 (2022)
Fluid overload has been linked to poor outcomes in the critically ill in recent years, with multiple studies showing an increase in mortality in the overall intensive care unit population. Although the administration of hypertonic saline has increased in recent years, few publications involving its use in intensive care unit have been published to date. The aim of this systematic review is to compare hypertonic and isotonic saline solutions and assess the current evidence to determine whether hypertonic saline can be used in the intensive care unit to treat critically ill or injured patients.
The PRISMA protocol was applied to conduct the search, which generated 622 possible trials. Only four papers were chosen and included in our study after duplicates and studies that did not fulfill our inclusion criteria, and outcomes were removed. The primary outcome was mortality, with the length of time spent in intensive care and in the hospital as secondary outcomes, and patients assessed in the intensive care unit ranged from 3 to 55, according to our revision. There were three to 24 trials in all, and not all of them used mortality or intensive care unit stay as an endpoint. The concentration of HS used in the intervention group ranged from 1.4 to 30%, while not all studies used isotonic saline solution as a control group.
Despite the limited scientific evidence, there seems to be support for the administration/use of hypertonic saline in the intensive care unit setting, in highly selected circumstance. Although hypertonic saline may have favorable therapeutic effects, no effect on mortality has been demonstrated. Patients suffering from a traumatic brain injury evidence suggests that hypertonic saline can effectively lower intracranial pressure, and there is a new trend supporting the use of hypertonic sodium solutions in these situations. Our updated review shows that studies still have a lot of variability, and that more controlled research are needed.
Fluid excess is linked to poor outcomes in critically ill patients, according to a growing body of evidence (Kim et al. 2017; Lee et al. 2015; Corcoran et al. 2012). In patients suffering from volume overload, studies have shown an increase in mortality in the overall intensive care unit (ICU) population (Garzotto et al. 2016), patients with sepsis (Chen et al. 2016), kidney failure (Haase-Fielitz et al. 2017), post-surgery (Kulemann et al. 2013), an increase in ICU-acquired infections (Corcoran et al. 2012), more postoperative complications (Haase-Fielitz et al. 2017), and a longer ICU and hospital stay (Mitchell et al. 2015; Magee and Zbrozek 2013). Exacerbation of the components of the “death triad” or “bloody vicious cycle” (acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy) is one of the primary ways through which crystalloids can contribute to poor outcome (Cotton et al. 2006). Fluid excess should therefore be avoided, and fluid administration should be kept to a minimum. The paradoxical impact of fast fluid administration is intriguing. They may promote the release of atrial natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), which can cause vasodilation and initiate diuresis, lowering sensitivity to vasoconstrictors and attenuating the effect of volume load during elective cesarean delivery (Teoh et al. 2014). In this context, a useful approach is to consider intravenous fluids as drugs, including specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties, whose positive effects are inconstant, and which carries a significant risk of adverse effects (Hoorn 2017; Cecconi et al. 2015; Severs et al. 2015).
In a different approach, hypertonic fluid is used instead of isotonic fluid. Hypertonic saline (HS) is a term used to describe solutions with higher sodium and chloride molar contents. Hypertonic fluids cause an osmotic gradient across the vascular space, pulling fluid into the vessels from the interstitial and intracellular compartment (Tyagi et al. 2007). Hypertonic fluids have been shown to increase cardiac output, decrease tissue and endothelium edema, improve microcirculation and blood viscosity (Rocha e Silva 2014; Frithiof et al. 2007; Rocha-e-Silva and Poli de Figueiredo 2005), and regulate the inflammatory response (Lu et al. 2007;Angle et al. 2000). Such changes have clinical implications, such as a reduction in the total volume of fluid required for resuscitation and a lower susceptibility to sepsis in hemorrhagic shock patients. Several of these researches, which are outside the scope of this review, have focused on hypertonic solutions with additional colloids.
Although hypertonic fluids have a range of benefit, they also have a lot of drawbacks. Hypertonic saline solution can cause hypernatremia, hypokalemia, and hyperchloremia, as well as a rapid increase in plasma osmolality and electrolyte imbalances. These changes can cause catastrophic effects in susceptible patients, including arrhythmias, metabolic acidosis, and central pontine myelinolysis (White et al. 2006). Although rare, central pontine myelinolysis is thought to be more common when hyponatremia is treated too quickly, and prolonged starvation and drinking may also enhance the risk (Kumar et al. 2006). Furthermore, hypertonic saline solution might aggravate bleeding in patients with a non-tamponized injury (Bhardwaj and Ulatowski 2004). Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has increased in the USA in recent years, accounting for around 2.2% of all deaths in the USA (Taylor et al. 2017), and with a significant proportion of deaths across all age groups. In patients with head traumas, hypertonic solutions have been advocated as the fluid of choice (Walsh et al. 1991), since they may maintain cerebral perfusion pressure without producing brain swelling due to an increase in intracranial pressure. Hypertonic saline has similar effects on intracranial pressure (ICP) as mannitol; however, they may not last as long (Qureshi and Suarez 2000). Both mannitol and sodium have minimal blood-brain barrier penetration, which aids in maintaining the osmotic gradient between brain tissue and intravascular space (Grape and Ravussin 2012; Fink 2012;Vialet et al. 2003). Local vasodilation may be one of hypertonic saline’s brain-protective characteristics, counteracting the vasospasm that occurs because of TBI (Shackford et al. 1994). Aside from its impact on intracranial pressure, hypertonic saline causes an increase in mean arterial pressure, which helps to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion pressure (Grape and Ravussin 2012). HS concentrations utilized in clinical trials range from 1.8 to 30% NaCl with variable osmoles loading in several investigations (Himmelseher 2007; Johnson and Criddle 2004). The values represent safety concerns, with concentrations above 10% being potentially dangerous due to possibly opening tight junctions in the blood-brain barrier (Suarez 2004).
Although there is now a lot of experimental information demonstrating hypertonic saline’s hemodynamic and microvascular characteristics (Rocha e Silva 2014; Frithiof et al. 2007; Tyagi et al. 2007; Rocha-e-Silva and Poli de Figueiredo 2005), a Cochrane review has highlighted the lack of clinical evidence to support the routine use of hypertonic saline as a resuscitation fluid (Bunn et al. 2002) and clinical trials comparing hypertonic and isotonic solutions (Wu et al. 2017; Bulger et al. 2010; Bulger et al. 2008; Vassar et al. 1990) have yielded conflicting results. Finally, but certainly not least, what is the HS position?
This review looks at the available evidence to see if hypertonic saline can be used in the ICU to resuscitate critically ill or injured patients.
We prioritized systematic reviews and meta-analyses, followed by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adult ICU patients, with the primary goal of comparing the effects of hypertonic saline (HS) as a resuscitation fluid to conventional saline solutions. Trials in pediatric patients, pregnant women, studies comparing crystalloid versus other colloid solutions or hypertonic saline-colloid mixtures, studies investigating hypertonic solutions other than HS, trials comparing hypertonic saline versus other hypertonic solutions, and hypertonic saline for inhalation therapy or cystic fibrosis were all excluded. All papers were evaluated, but only those having a complete English translation, or an English abstract, were considered for inclusion. The following are the exclusion criteria (see Table 1):
Primary outcomes: mortality
Secondary outcomes: the amount of time spent in intensive care as well as the total average time spent in the hospital
Electronic searches Ovid
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, PubMed and PubMed Central (PMC) (National Library of Medicine), and OVID (medical research platform) CINAHL for this updated review. Controlled clinical trials, RCTs, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were the only publication types we considered. The comprehensive search took place from January to July 2019 and was updated through January 2021. We used a search and bibliographical arrangement program due to the large number of databases and publications available. We selected Zotero software, which is a tool for finding, organizing, and analyzing articles (Duong 2010). We also looked for ongoing trials on trial registries such as clinicaltrials.gov, controlled-trials.com, and ifpma.org/clinicaltrials.
Search methods for identification of studies
The first query, the population query, had the headings and terms “Intensive Care Unit” OR “Intensive Critical Care” OR “Critical Care” OR “Critical Care” OR “Critically Ill” OR “Critical Illness.” The second query, exposure query, was formed of following headings and terms: “saline solution, hypertonic” OR “hypertonic saline” OR “Hypertonic Solutions, Saline” OR “Saline Hypertonic Solutions” OR “Solutions, Saline hypertonic” OR “Saline Solutions, Hypertonic” OR “Sodium Chloride Solution, Hypertonic” OR “Hypertonic Saline Solutions” OR “Solutions, Hypertonic Saline.” The third query, the outcome query, was composed of the following headings and terms: “mortality in ICU” OR “survival in ICU,” and “time in ICU.” Additionally, reference lists of possibly relevant reports and reviews were examined to find other research that fit the criteria.
Data collection and analysis/selection of studies/authors contributions
The study’s design and data collection were done by all the authors. Two authors (EPD) (LD) scanned titles and abstracts founded during the initial search to remove duplicates and irrelevant research, as well as trials that fulfilled our inclusion criteria. With the intervention of a third adjudicator (MAD), any conflicts were resolved by consensus. To identify potentially overlooked studies, we searched at the individual references of included studies as well as relevant narrative reviews. We required the study to be conducted in ICU, and we also required the study to report death, intensive care survival status, and hospital stay duration. Ethics committee approval was not required as no patients were involved in this review. All the included studies were subjectively and independently assessed for risk of biases (Table 2) by two authors (MD, EPD) using the bias domain described in PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Page et al. 2021). The studies were assigned a judgment of “high,” “low,” or “unclear” risk of bias across the following domains: sequence generation, allocation concealment, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, selective reporting bias, and other bias.
Because of the heterogeneity of the body of literature and the inability to investigate the rigor of findings, a meta-analysis was not done. Given the low reported incidence of mortality or serious morbidity in the trials studied, estimating sample size is difficult. Due to it, we felt to be inappropriate to pool them and to apply statistical analysis. This review is registered in PROSPERO with registry number: 245748.
The PRISMA protocol was used in the search approach, which yielded 622 potential articles (PRISMA flowchart given in Fig. 1 — appendix) (Liberati et al. 2009). Three-hundred sixty-three titles and abstracts were assessed for inclusion criteria after duplicates were removed. For various reasons (outside of our inclusion criteria), detailed review rejected 353 papers, resulting in the retrieval of 10 publications for full-text analysis. Six studies were eliminated following a thorough review because they did not meet the primary criteria. Only four studies (Pfortmueller and Schefold 2017; Berger-Pelleiter et al. 2016; Strandvik 2009; Bunn et al. 2004) met the pre-specified inclusion criteria and were included in this review (Table 3) and reviewed in detail.
The concentration of HS in the intervention group ranged from 1.4 to 30%; while not all studies used isotonic saline solution as a control group, it ranged from 12 to 80%. The number of patients in the ICU ranged from 3 (12%) to 55 (100%). Only one study (Strandvik 2009) was undertaken exclusively in ICU patients. The outcome measured ranged from three trials (Pfortmueller and Schefold 2017; Bunn et al. 2004) and four trials (Berger-Pelleiter et al. 2016) to 24 trials (Strandvik 2009) (Table 3).
Pfortmueller and Schefold (2017) conducted a systematic review of adult ICU patients with clinically heterogenous patients. Following their revision, they found that 25 papers satisfied the predetermined inclusion criterion. Only three articles (Duchesne et al. 2012; Parrinello et al. 2011; Ramires et al. 1992) evaluated patients in ICUs with mortality as an endpoint; the rest did not match the primary inclusion criteria. However, two studies (Duchesne et al. 2012; Ramires et al. 1992) were a prospective review, and another (Parrinello et al. 2011) included furosemide as an adjuvant in the groups. The conclusion of Pfortmueller and Schefold (2017) is that in carefully selected critically ill patients, the use of hypertonic saline may have therapeutic benefits.
In their final analyses, Berger-Pelleiter et al. (2016) included eleven trials in their randomized study. Eight (72%) of the studies were conducted in an ICU setting, and only four of the studies reported mortality as a result. Two studies use 0.9% NaCl as a control group and hypertonic saline-dextran (HSD) as an intervention group, both of which are prehospital trials conducted outside of the ICU. Based on the current level of evidence in the areas of mortality and intracranial pressure control, they conclude that “hypertonic saline could thus not be recommended as a first-line agent for managing patients with severe traumatic brain injury.”
Strandvik (2009) looked at two types of ICU patients: those in shock (29 trials) and those with intracranial hypertension (26 trials). Forty-one (74%) trials were removed from the total because they compared HS to fluids other than 0.9% NaCl, and twenty-four (43%) of the studies reveal death as a result, four (7%) of which are child studies. The conclusion of Strandvik (2009) is that hypertonic saline solutions are effective at lowering intracranial pressure and restoring blood pressure in hemorrhagic shock but not in other forms of shock. They also reported no benefit from HS in terms of survival or prognosis.
Bunn et al. (2004) identified eighteen randomized studies with the aim to determine whether HS lowers mortality in patients with hypovolemia and head trauma, ten (56%) of which were done in the intensive care unit. They concluded that the review does not give enough data to be able to say whether hypertonic solution is better than isotonic and near isotonic crystalloid for the resuscitation of patients with trauma or burns or those undergoing surgery.
We identified two systematic views where HS is superior to 0.9% NaCl (Pfortmueller and Schefold 2017; Strandvik 2009): one study where there is equality of effects (Berger-Pelleiter et al. 2016) and one where it is not possible to prove any superiority or inferiority between the solutions for lack of evidence (Bunn et al. 2004). Regarding the diversity that the studies reveal, it is not possible to say that HS is superior to 0.9% NaCl for the resuscitation of patients in ICU. Our review indicates that, in highly selected circumstances, HS may offer some beneficial clinical effects, but that no effect on mortality has been demonstrated.
HS has been recommended as the fluid of choice in TCI as well (Qureshi and Suarez 2000). It can maintain cerebral perfusion pressure constant without creating brain edema or an increase in intracranial pressure (Shackford et al. 1998; Walsh et al. 1991), and most studies found no significant side effects or symptoms of osmotic demyelination syndrome (Blissitt 2012; Kumar et al. 2006). Since 2007, the section on hyperosmolar therapy in the Brain Trauma Foundation’s Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (Brain Trauma Foundation 2007) has included a discussion of both mannitol and HS. However, due to a lack of HS data, only evidence in favor of mannitol was classified. Since then, there has been more experience using HS in the therapy of elevated ICP and on mortality outcomes (Wu et al. 2017; Barbic et al. 2010). Our revision shows no survival benefit with the use of HS solutions, but the evidence is that HS and mannitol effectively lower ICP with a new trend favoring the use of hypertonic sodium solutions in patients with TBI (Mangat et al. 2020; Marko 2012;Hays et al. 2011;Wenham et al. 2008).
During our analysis, we found that different clinical questions and inclusion criteria resulted in varied outcomes, and this issue has not been resolved due to the inconsistent results of clinical trials and systematic reviews. The discrepancies in outcomes could be attributed to a variety of factors, including patient populations, fluid types and amounts, and the comparator fluids’ safety profile. As a result, various potential causes of heterogeneity as well as the statistical rigor of certain findings could not be investigated.
What is the HS position?
Despite the limited scientific evidence, there seems to be support for the administration/use of HS in the ICU setting, in highly selected circumstances. It is a well-known fact that none of the standard of care procedures used today has ever been put to the formal test of efficacy or safety, but the extensive empirical medical experience and expert opinion attached to their use warrant the view that they are generally effective and usually safe (Bajwa and Kalra 2013; Hinson et al. 2013; Hays et al. 2011;Wenham et al. 2008). HS may offer some beneficial clinical effects, but that no effect on mortality has been demonstrated. Our updated review demonstrates that studies still show great variability, and that there is a need for better and large controlled studies.
Availability of data and materials
All the peer-reviewed publications and methods are mentioned with references.
Intensive care unit
Atrial natriuretic peptide
Traumatic brain injury
Randomized controlled trials
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials
- OVID CINAHL:
Cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature, medical and nursing research platform
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Angle N, Cabello-Passini R, Hoyt DB, Loomis WH, Shreve A, Namiki S, Junger WG (2000) Hypertonic saline infusion: can it regulate human neutrophil function? Shock 14:503–508. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024382-200014050-00002
Bajwa SJ, Kalra S (2013) Logical empiricism in anesthesia: a step forward in modern day clinical practice. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 29(2):160–161 PMID: 23878433; PMCID: PMC3713659
Barbic D, Barbic S, Lang E, Jayaraman D (2010) Hypertonic saline in acute traumatic brain injury? A systematic review and meta-analysis. CJEM 12(3):229–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1481803500012318
Berger-Pelleiter E, Émond M, Lauzier F, Shields JF, Turgeon AF (2016) Hypertonic saline in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CJEM 2016 18(02):112–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2016.12
Bhardwaj A, Ulatowski JA (2004) Hypertonic saline solutions in brain injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 10:126–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/00075198-200404000-00009
Blissitt PA (2012) Controversies in the management of adults with severe traumatic brain injury. AACN Adv Crit Care 23(2):188–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCI.0b013e31824db4f3
Brain Trauma Foundation (2007) American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury: hyperosmolar therapy. J Neurotrauma 24(Suppl 1):S14–S20. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2007.9994
Bulger EM, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Copass MK, Hanson S, Cooper C et al (2008) Hypertonic resuscitation of hypovolemic shock after blunt trauma: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 143(2):139–148. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2007.41
Bulger EM, May S, Brasel KJ, Schreiber M, Kerby JD, Tisherman SA et al (2010) ROC Investigators. Out-of-hospital hypertonic resuscitation following severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 304(13):1455–1464. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1405
Bunn F, Roberts I, Tasker R, Akpa E (2002) Hypertonic versus isotonic crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD002045. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002045
Bunn F, Roberts I, Tasker R, Akpa E (2004) Hypertonic versus near isotonic crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004(3):CD002045. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002045.pub2
Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul JL, Pettila V, Wilkman E, Molnar Z et al (2015) Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med 41:1529–1537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3850-x
Chen J, Li X, Bai Z, Fang F, Hua J, Li Y et al (2016) Association of fluid accumulation with clinical outcomes in critically ill children with severe sepsis. PLoS One 11(7):e0160093. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160093
Corcoran T, Rhodes JE, Clarke S, Myles PS, Ho KM (2012) Perioperative fluid management strategies in major surgery: a stratified meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 114(3):640–651. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318240d6eb
Cotton BA, Guy JS, Morris JA, Abumrad NN (2006) The cellular, metabolic, and systemic consequences of aggressive fluid resuscitation strategies. Shock. 26:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.shk.0000209564.84822.f2
Duchesne JC, Simms E, Guidry C, Duke M, Beeson E, McSwain NE, Cotton B (2012) Damage control immunoregulation: is there a role for low-volume hypertonic saline resuscitation in patients managed with damage control surgery? Am Surg 78(9):962–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481207800936
Duong K (2010) Rolling out Zotero across campus as a part of a science librarian’s outreach efforts. Sci Technol Libr 29(4):315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2010.523309
Fink ME (2012) Osmotherapy for intracranial hypertension: mannitol versus hypertonic saline. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 18(3):640–654. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.CON.0000415432.84147.1e
Frithiof R, Eriksson S, Bayard F, Svensson T, Rundgren M (2007) Intravenous hypertonic NaCl acts via cerebral sodium-sensitive and angiotensinergic mechanisms to improve cardiac function in hemorrhaged conscious sheep. J Physiol 583(Pt3):1129–1143. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139592
Garzotto F, Ostermann M, Martín-Langerwerf D, Sánchez-Sánchez M, Teng J, Robert R et al (2016) The dose response multicentre investigation on fluid assessment (DoReMIFA) in critically ill patients. Crit Care 20(1):196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1355-9
Grape S, Ravussin P (2012) PRO: osmotherapy for the treatment of acute intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 24(4):402–406. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ana.0000419729.52363.64
Haase-Fielitz A, Haase M, Bellomo R, Calzavacca P, Spura A, Baraki H et al (2017) Perioperative hemodynamic instability and fluid overload are associated with increasing acute kidney injury severity and worse outcome after cardiac surgery. Blood Purif 43(4):298–308. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455061
Hays AN, Lazaridis C, Neyens R, Nicholas J, Gay S, Chalela JA (2011) Osmotherapy: use among neurointensivists. Neurocrit Care 14:222–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-010-9477-4
Himmelseher S (2007) Hypertonic saline solutions for treatment of intracranial hypertension. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 20:414–426. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282eff9ea
Hinson HE, Stein D, Sheth KN (2013) Hypertonic saline and mannitol therapy in critical care neurology. J Intensive Care Med 28(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066611400688
Hoorn EJ (2017) Intravenous fluids: balancing solutions. J Nephrol 30(4):485–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-016-0363-9
Johnson AL, Criddle LM (2004) Pass the salt: indications for and implications of using hypertonic saline. Crit Care Nurse 24(5):36–38 40-4, 46 passim. PMID: 15526489
Kim IY, Kim JH, Lee DW, Lee SB, Rhee H, Seong EY et al (2017) Fluid overload and survival in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. PLoS One 12(2):e0172137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172137
Kulemann B, Timme S, Seifert G, Holzner PA, Glatz T, Sick O et al (2013) Intraoperative crystalloid overload leads to substantial inflammatory infiltration of intestinal anastomoses-a histomorphological analysis. Surgery 154(3):596–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.010
Kumar S, Fowler M, Gonzalez-Toledo E, Jaffe SL (2006) Central pontine myelinolysis, an update. Neurol Res 28(3):360–366. https://doi.org/10.1179/016164106X110346
Lee J, de Louw E, Niemi M, Nelson R, Mark RG, Celi LA et al (2015) Association between fluid balance and survival in critically ill patients. J Intern Med 277(4):468–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12274
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
Lu YQ, Cai XJ, Gu LH, Mu HZ, Huang WD (2007) Hypertonic saline resuscitation maintains a more balanced profile of T-lymphocyte subpopulations in a rat model of hemorrhagic shock. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 8(1):70–75. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0070
Magee G, Zbrozek A (2013) Fluid overload is associated with increases in length of stay and hospital costs: pooled analysis of data from more than 600 US hospitals. CEOR 5:289–296. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S45873
Mangat HS, Wu X, Gerber LM, Schwarz JT, Fakhar M, Murthy SB et al (2020) Hypertonic saline is superior to mannitol for the combined effect on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure burdens in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 86(2):221–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz046
Marko NF (2012) Hypertonic saline, not mannitol, should be considered gold-standard medical therapy for intracranial hypertension. Crit Care 16(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11182
Mitchell KH, Carlbom D, Caldwell E, Leary PJ, Himmelfarb J, Hough CL (2015) Volume overload: prevalence, risk factors, and functional outcome in survivors of septic shock. Ann Am Thorac Soc 12(12):1837–1844. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201504-187OC
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Parrinello G, Paterna S, Di Pasquale P, Torres D, Mezzero M, Cardillo M et al (2011) Changes in estimating echocardiography pulmonary capillary wedge pressure after hypersaline plus furosemide versus furosemide alone in decompensated heart failure. J Card Fail 17(4):331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.11.003
Pfortmueller CA, Schefold JC (2017) Hypertonic saline in critical illness - a systematic review. J Crit Care 42:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.019
Qureshi AI, Suarez JI (2000) Use of hypertonic saline solutions in treatment of cerebral edema and intracranial hypertension. Crit Care Med 28(9):3301–3301. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200009000-00032
Ramires JA, Serrano Júnior CV, César LA, Velasco IT, Rocha e Silva Júnior M, Pileggi F (1992) Acute hemodynamic effects of hypertonic (7.5%) saline infusion in patients with cardiogenic shock due to right ventricular infarction. Circ Shock 37(3):220–225 PMID: 1423912
Rocha e Silva M (2014) Hypertonic saline for treatment of shock. Med Express 1(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.5935/MedicalExpress.2014.01.04
Rocha-e-Silva M, Poli de Figueiredo LF (2005) Small volume hypertonic resuscitation of circulatory shock. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 60(2):159–172. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322005000200013
Severs D, Rookmaaker MB, Hoorn EJ (2015) Intravenous solutions in the care of patients with volume depletion and electrolyte abnormalities. Am J Kidney Dis 66(1):147–153. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.031
Shackford SR, Bourguignon PR, Wald SL, Rogers FB, Osler TM, Clark D (1998) Hypertonic saline resuscitation of patients with head injury: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Trauma 44:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199801000-00004
Shackford SR, Schmoker JD, Zhuang J (1994) The effect of hypertonic resuscitation on pial arteriolar tone after brain injury and shock. J Trauma 37(6):899–908. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199412000-00005
Strandvik GF (2009) Hypertonic saline in critical care: a review of the literature and guidelines for use in hypotensive states and raised intracranial pressure. Anaesthesia 64(9):990–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05986.x
Suarez JI (2004) Hypertonic saline for cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure. Cleve Clin J Med 71(Suppl. 1) S9–13. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.71.suppl-1.s9
Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L (2017) Traumatic brain injury–related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths — United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ 66(9):1–16. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1
Teoh WHL, Westphal M, Kampmeier TG (2014) Update on volume therapy in obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 28(3):297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2014.07.004
Tyagi R, Donaldson K, Loftus CM, Jallo J (2007) Hypertonic saline: a clinical review. Neurosurg Rev 30(4):277–289; discussion 289-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-007-0091-7
Vassar MJ, Perry CA, Holcroft JW (1990) Analysis of potential risks associated with 7.5% sodium chloride resuscitation of traumatic shock. Arch Surg 125:1309–1315. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410220093013
Vialet R, Albanèse J, Thomachot L, Antonini F, Bourgouin A, Alliez B, Martin C (2003) Isovolume hypertonic solutes (sodium chloride or mannitol) in the treatment of refractory posttraumatic intracranial hypertension: 2 ml/kg 7.5% saline is more effective than 2 ml/kg 20% mannitol. Crit Care Med 2003 31(6):1683–1687. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000063268.91710.df
Walsh JC, Zhuang J, Shackford SR (1991) A comparison of hypertonic to isotonic fluid in the resuscitation of brain injury and hemorrhagic shock. J Surg Res 50(3):284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4804(91)90192-O
Wenham TN, Hormis AP, Andrzejowski JC (2008) Hypertonic saline after traumatic brain injury in UK neuro-critical care practice. Anaesthesia 63:558–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05532.x
White H, Cook D, Venkatesh B (2006) The use of hypertonic saline for treating intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury. Anesth Anal 102(6):1836–1846. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000217208.51017.56
Wu MC, Liao TY, Lee EM, Chen YS, Hsu WT, Lee MG et al (2017) Administration of hypertonic solutions for hemorrhagic shock. Anesth Analg 125(5):1549–1557. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002451
The authors declare that they have not received any funding or sponsorship contributions.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics committee approval was not required as no patients were involved in this review. No patients participated in this review, so consent for participation is not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Dornelles, M., Dornelles, E.P. & Dornelles, L.P. Hypertonic saline in ICU setting: what is its position? A systematic review and empirical analysis. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol 14, 55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-022-00254-x
- Critically ill
- Hypertonic saline
- Intensive care unit
- Time in intensive care unit
- Traumatic brain injury
- Intracranial pressure